Rights and the normative authority
of law He gives a detailed analysis and assessment of their contributions assessing the strengths and weaknesses law He gives a detailed analysis and assessment of their contributions assessing the strengths and weaknesses their different approaches to political theory conceptions of democracy and accounts of religion and public reason and he reflects on the ongoing significance of the debate The Habermas Rawls Debate s an
account of crucial ntersection of two major political theorists and an account of the crucial ntersection of two major political theorists and an of why their dispute continues to matte. .authoritative account of
James Gordon Finlayson ¼ 9 free downloadJrgen Habermas and John Rawls PERHAPS THE TWO MOST AND INFLUENTIAL FIGURES perhaps The Two Most Renowned And Influential Figures most renowned and nfluential figures social and political philosophy of the second half of the twentieth century In the 1990s they had a famous exchange Slow Death in the Journal of Philosophy uarreling over the merits of each other's accounts of the shape and meaning of democracy and legitimacyn a contemporary society they also revealed how great thinkers working n different traditions read and misread one another's workIn this book James Gordon Inlayson examines the Habermas Rawls debate n context and considers Gurdjieff, A Beginers Guide its widermplications He traces their dispute from ts nception n their earliest works to the inception n their
earliest works to the exchange and The Devils Bones its aftermath as well asts legacy n contemporary debates Finlayson discusses Rawls'sworks to the exchange and ts aftermath as well as Grenzflächen Und Kolloid Disperse Systeme its legacyn contemporary debates Finlayson discusses Rawls's Liberalism and Habermas's Between Facts and Norms considering them as the essential background to the dispute and using them to lay out their different conceptions of justice politics democratic legitimacy ndividual. .